3 ms·
I don't think there's enough information to make that assertion there.
by iasay 4y ago
I don't think there's enough information to make that assertion there.
- abraxas 4y agoLet's be aggressive and interpret this into a worst case and assume that the author is referring to one week and 700 million messages. That's 100M messages per day or 1157 messages per second. That volume could be handled by a single DB table in an ACID way eliminating the need for a separate cluster
- iasay 4y agoDatabases aren’t queues. I’ve been burned by that a million times over the years. Also you screw your OLTP capacity there.
- abraxas 4y agoAt these volumes they can very well be. And when that is no longer tenable the time comes to introduce a streaming message system like Kafka. In my experience the use case for something like Rabbit is a small crevice between these two solutions that I have little use for
- iasay 4y agoI wouldn’t use RabbitMQ. I’d use SQS.