4 ms·
Lol to “ Kafka is at least a bit simpler than RabbitMQ”. I’m sorry, what universe does this statement live in?
by davydog187 4y ago
Lol to “ Kafka is at least a bit simpler than RabbitMQ”. I’m sorry, what universe does this statement live in?
- Spivak 4y agoTrue, it’s actually a lot simpler than RabbitMQ. People seem to assume “giant ball of enterprisey Java means” that the experience using it will be complicated. Kafka is extremely reliable, simple to cluster, battle tested (I haven’t hit an actual bug in Kafka in ages), the self-healing is turnkey, and has way stronger guarantees for clients. Where it bites people is that it’s not a queue and scaling is harder than just add more consumers.
- rawgabbit 4y agoI am curious if anyone has used confluent.io (kafka as a service). Or is it too cost prohibitive?
- d8tltanc 4y agoJava is a bit simpler than erlang