3 ms·
Well, it's indirect, but they're still ultimately responsible for it. If there weren't any control, why would anyone invest?
by grandalf 15y ago
Well, it's indirect, but they're still ultimately responsible for it. If there weren't any control, why would anyone invest?
- a3camero 15y agoThat's a good question (not sarcasm, it might come off that way). I actually do have a small investment yet I never planned on exercising any control and only control a trivial number of shares. There's a fair bit of academic debate on these theories of control and how shareholders relate to companies. Personally I think there's a lot of freeloading off the small group of big players that do exercise control. I have a certain amount of faith that they won't vote in a way that's seriously adverse to my interests as a little fish.