4 ms·
They can go out of business at least and not be a burden to the public anymore. I think the point of the comment was there would be some accountability being fo
by georgeplusplus 4y ago
They can go out of business at least and not be a burden to the public anymore. I think the point of the comment was there would be some accountability being for-profit or at least a metric that the bureaucracy is performing correctly. I dont agree with this notion but I wont resort to attacking him like a rabid dog for suggesting such a thing like all the responses seem to do.
- HeckFeck 4y agoYeah I get this notion too. Given the relative difference in size and complexity of structure, there is a vast power imbalance between the state and the citizen. There needs to be much more accountability.
- shreyshnaccount 4y agoagreed, but mega corps aren't really the peak of accountability. i'd argue that a panchayat (local self govt in India) is far more accountable and transparent (tho still far from perfect, and having real problems too) than amazon.
- sophacles 4y agoPeople calling out the poster for presenting an ill thought out, old and long debunked idea is "attacking like a rabid dog"?
- shreyshnaccount 4y agonot if they are a monopoly. that only leads to crap service. the state-company will be a monopoly. what's the guarantee that a state-company won't instantly ban all competition in every industry? oh they will be elected you say? guess who's making the voting machines.