3 ms·
The design of both are very similar. There are only minor feature differences. The following list is not exhaustive: `securefs` has but `gocryptfs` hasn't: *
by netheril96 4y ago
The design of both are very similar. There are only minor feature differences. The following list is not exhaustive:
`securefs` has but `gocryptfs` hasn't:
* Native Windows support.
* Extended attribute on Mac.
* Random padding.
`gocryptfs` has but `securefs` hasn't:
* Reverse mount (mount a plain dir as an encrypted dir).
- POPOSYS 4y agoThanks for your quick reply - interesting, will take a look! BTW the reverse mount turns out to be a very useful feature that solves many problems with large file systems!