3 ms·
Guzey’s article has many “weak arguments and misleading claims” [0]. For bonus points, see Guzey’s appeal to logical fallacies in the comments. [0] https://www
by laserlight 4y ago
Guzey’s article has many “weak arguments and misleading claims” [0]. For bonus points, see Guzey’s appeal to logical fallacies in the comments.
[0] https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/sbcmACvB6DqYXYidL/counter-theses-on-sleep https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/sbcmACvB6DqYXYidL/counter-th...
- kruuuder 4y agoThe article you're quoting is a rebuttal of another article by Guzey, and not of his book review.
- laserlight 4y agoThanks for pointing it out. I must have confused, because I encountered similar problems in Guzey's review of the book.
- kiliantics 4y agoThere's a pretty long (4-part) discussion on Andrew Gelman's blog[0] about Guzey's article and the book. In the end I was pretty convinced that many of the book's claims cannot be trusted. [0] https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/12/27/why-we-sleep-data-manipulation-a-smoking-gun/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/12/27/why-we-sle...