3 ms·
If I had access to a time machine, while I'd certainly kill Hitler and Stalin first and second, whoever invented the concept of a "captive portal" would end up
by Kadin 4y ago
If I had access to a time machine, while I'd certainly kill Hitler and Stalin first and second, whoever invented the concept of a "captive portal" would end up dead before I ran out of bullets.
Just a stupid idea, badly implemented. So many places turned them on not because of any actual mandate from their legal department (how many places with captive portal pages actually have 'Legal Departments', anyway?) to do so, but because the feature was there in their routers, and thus it seemed like the "safe" thing to do. And once it became the standard thing for businesses to do, suddenly every business felt the need to do it. And now, people look at you like you're crazy if you suggest setting up a Guest WiFi network without one.
It's just too bad. This is literally why we can't have nice things.
- moring 4y agoThe hidden assumption here is that using a CP doesn't actually give you at least some legal protection or at least an advantage if you end up in court. Also, instead of blaming the restaurant owner who gets fire from all sides all the time, why not blame - lawmakers and courts for not stating clearly whether using a CP is expected, or what the alternatives are - OS, browser and access point vendors for inventing a more sane alternative than automated MitM attacks