3 ms·
The way I see it, anything can happen, and putting a label "very likely" on it as it comes to nukes, is suspicious. You'd need to be exceptionally close to the
by fleddr 4y ago
The way I see it, anything can happen, and putting a label "very likely" on it as it comes to nukes, is suspicious. You'd need to be exceptionally close to the source of decision making to call this likely, you can't just base it on speculation.
I've seen other argue that Russia's nukes probably won't even work. They haven't done a test since forever.
- yomkippur 4y agoYou have to be more specific, the world ending ICBM nukes will likely never be used but a tactile nukes have been deployed in the field and does not come with the same cadence of lauching ICBM from subs. I suggest found it weird that NATO would declare first that they have no treaty response for tactical nukes (sub 1KT) being used. If they are using SAM missiles meant to take down combat aircraft to attack ground targets, it means they are running out of missiles. Contrary to the popular opinion that the war will end when he runs out of missile, I believe Putin will opt for tactical nukes if somebody calls his bluff Doing so would immediately draw lines in the sand in Europe
- fleddr 4y agoWish I saved the link but recently there was an article documenting the exact opposite: every time somebody answers Russia's bluff, they back off and compromise.