Proving you haven't bothered to read the article. The woman herself is directly quoted as having been asked that specific question. I find it ironic that you'r

Proving you haven't bothered to read the article. The woman herself is directly quoted as having been asked that specific question. I find it ironic that you're making stuff up to accuse a journalist of making stuff up. Whether it happened or not is still open to question (is Gourley a believable person?), but it's not open to the accusation you're making.