3 ms·

Unicode Character Recognition

25 points by pixelcort 15y ago

xtacy 15y ago
I am getting an error. This reminds me of a very useful project, Detexify: http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
- haldean 15y ago
  Ditto, on both counts. I think we crashed it.
  - tricolon 15y ago
    Yup, I get Error: error.
    - stefankendall 15y ago
      shapecatcher.com works, www.shapecatcher.com does not. The ajax urls are borked.
- tikhonj 15y ago
  It does seem similar. I actually like Detexify's interface a little bit more because it doesn't require pressing a button after you've drawn your character, although I imagine that is a matter of preference. Detexify's popularity and utility shows that this sort of thing could be very useful--I suspect I might end up using it myself in the future.
- johnx123-up 15y ago
  For me, http://shapecatcher.com/ http://shapecatcher.com/ returns better results. Also, I'd suggest bookmarking option for search results.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
ninjin 15y ago
Love the idea, thought the same thing after having seen detexify and doing web development looking for suitable Unicode glyphs (glyph lists are a pain in the, well...). Keep it up and by all means fix the current error. ;)
ohkine 15y ago
This looks fairly promising, but it's not there yet. For example, try drawing a capital sigma ( Σ ); if you don't get your top and bottom bars perfectly parallel there's a strong chance you'll get gibberish back. Or try pi ( π or Π ); a 1° change in the angle of your bars might make the difference between a handful of relevant results and a full page of nonsensical Devanagari and Gurmukhi characters. Or do a double dagger ( ‡ ); if your middle bar isn't perfectly straight up and down it might think you're doing cent ( ¢ ) or integral ( ∫ ). It seems like it's extremely difficult to get the same results for the same 'search' — every time you get wildly different answers because the slightest little difference in how you draw it changes how it reads it. So i think the recognition algorithm needs a little work. I know you mentioned font limitations, so i suspect adding more of those would be a good start. Also, i don't see Japanese support, which is unfortunate. If you could get that working i would be an instant fan. (I deal with transcription of Japanese a lot, and although i'm proficient in kana, my kanji skills are pretty poor and probably always will be. What i've always wanted is a tool that can return kanji characters based on a drawing WITHOUT requiring strict adherence to stroke order. That last requirement rules out every single tool i've found...) Anyway good luck!
pixelcort 15y ago
Disclaimer: Someone else made this; I just posted it to HN.
stefankendall 15y ago
This only works if you go to the base URL: shapecatcher.com instead of www.shapecatcher.com Someone done goofed with the ajax.
brianobush 15y ago
fails horribly with any Chinese or Japanese (tested Kanji and hiragana) characters.

25 points by pixelcort 15y ago

xtacy 15y ago

I am getting an error. This reminds me of a very useful project, Detexify: http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html

haldean 15y ago
Ditto, on both counts. I think we crashed it.
- tricolon 15y ago
  Yup, I get Error: error.
  - stefankendall 15y ago
    shapecatcher.com works, www.shapecatcher.com does not. The ajax urls are borked.
tikhonj 15y ago
It does seem similar. I actually like Detexify's interface a little bit more because it doesn't require pressing a button after you've drawn your character, although I imagine that is a matter of preference. Detexify's popularity and utility shows that this sort of thing could be very useful--I suspect I might end up using it myself in the future.
johnx123-up 15y ago
For me, http://shapecatcher.com/ http://shapecatcher.com/ returns better results. Also, I'd suggest bookmarking option for search results.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

ninjin 15y ago

Love the idea, thought the same thing after having seen detexify and doing web development looking for suitable Unicode glyphs (glyph lists are a pain in the, well...). Keep it up and by all means fix the current error. ;)

ohkine 15y ago

This looks fairly promising, but it's not there yet. For example, try drawing a capital sigma ( Σ ); if you don't get your top and bottom bars perfectly parallel there's a strong chance you'll get gibberish back. Or try pi ( π or Π ); a 1° change in the angle of your bars might make the difference between a handful of relevant results and a full page of nonsensical Devanagari and Gurmukhi characters. Or do a double dagger ( ‡ ); if your middle bar isn't perfectly straight up and down it might think you're doing cent ( ¢ ) or integral ( ∫ ). It seems like it's extremely difficult to get the same results for the same 'search' — every time you get wildly different answers because the slightest little difference in how you draw it changes how it reads it. So i think the recognition algorithm needs a little work. I know you mentioned font limitations, so i suspect adding more of those would be a good start. Also, i don't see Japanese support, which is unfortunate. If you could get that working i would be an instant fan. (I deal with transcription of Japanese a lot, and although i'm proficient in kana, my kanji skills are pretty poor and probably always will be. What i've always wanted is a tool that can return kanji characters based on a drawing WITHOUT requiring strict adherence to stroke order. That last requirement rules out every single tool i've found...) Anyway good luck!

pixelcort 15y ago

Disclaimer: Someone else made this; I just posted it to HN.

stefankendall 15y ago

This only works if you go to the base URL: shapecatcher.com instead of www.shapecatcher.com Someone done goofed with the ajax.

brianobush 15y ago

fails horribly with any Chinese or Japanese (tested Kanji and hiragana) characters.