3 ms·
Actually the entire article is a shitshow, the last bit is telling about how much effort was applied: Information on the Australian government’s Smartraveller
by throwaway67743 4y ago
Actually the entire article is a shitshow, the last bit is telling about how much effort was applied:
Information on the Australian government’s Smartraveller website warns citizens in general terms that US authorities “have broad powers when deciding if you’re eligible to enter”.
Travellers must provide an onward or return ticket and show they have enough money to support themselves, it says, and should be prepared to answer questions about the purpose of the visit, how long they plan to stay, where they will stay and their ties to Australia.
“If you provide false information, or can’t satisfy the officials you’re visiting for a valid reason, you can be refused entry,” the advice says.
- phs318u 4y agoAll of which is factual and none of which detracts from the main point which is why did a CBP officer ask the woman (as quoted by the woman herself) whether she had had an abortion? Questioning this is a legitimate basis for an article given what's happening in the US. Nowhere in the article is the claim made that she was deported due to an abortion.
- throwaway67743 4y agoYou missed my other reply where it's a claim without basis and may easily have been an innocent well being question