> Rather 10% compared to what one could do with better training, improved lifestyle, etc. If you're talking about 10% of some non-physical concept of brain "po

> Rather 10% compared to what one could do with better training, improved lifestyle, etc. If you're talking about 10% of some non-physical concept of brain "potential", then you have to define, potential WHAT? Creativity? Intelligence? Speed of thought? Hand/eye coordination? Something else deemed important? All of it? None of it? How could you possibly attach a 10% potential value to any of this unless you operationalize it down to some tiny measurable part that lose the gestalt? If we're not defining the 10% as physical brain area, then the 10% proposition seems not only unlikely true but likely meaningless, a priori.