4 ms·
I agree with this... and my understanding of their logic is that it was never a federal issue and should have been a state issue the whole time. Now, I persona
by johng 4y ago
I agree with this... and my understanding of their logic is that it was never a federal issue and should have been a state issue the whole time.
Now, I personally feel the states should ALSO say that it is none of their business and treat it as such. That would be the proper way.
So I agree with their ruling, but I also agree that unfortunately the states are going to have their own laws. I much prefer this over the government controlling the entire country via this method.
The whole idea of statehood is that people of that state vote on the direction of the state. You then move around the US to find a state that is more aligned with your values.
Just my 2c.
- IceMetalPunk 4y ago> The whole idea of statehood is that people of that state vote on the direction of the state. You then move around the US to find a state that is more aligned with your values. And the whole point of being a federation with a federal congress, a president, and a Supreme Court is that some issues are important enough to enforce regulations or freedoms across all the states as a whole. If you don't want federal governance, then you're arguing in favor of each state basically becoming their own country, with free movement agreements between them. Which is quite different to what how the US actually is structured.