5 ms·

We are working on stabilizing the app, sorry for the trouble.

• IYasha 4y ago
  It's not your fault, it's common to CloudFlare.
  • juunpp 4y ago
    I would not have said 'garbage service', but CloudFlare does make we want to punch a wall or sometimes. I get the impression that half the people using CloudFlare don't actually need it.
    • gc0119 4y ago
      In this case we actually benefit from CloudFlare on the launch. The hug is quite hard from HN. We love you HN.
      • juunpp 4y ago
        Really, how? I would have thought that running the image processing on that backend would be much more expensive than serving the relatively static website?
        • gc0119 4y ago
          That is true!
          • juunpp 4y ago
            Then how do you benefit from CloudFlare? Legit curious.
            • gc0119 4y ago
              Oh the DDoS protection and traffic routing, their service is pretty easy to set up.
              • juunpp 4y ago
                Who is DDoSing you? This website is not a high-profile target, I'm not sure why anyone would be interested in attacking this. Or do your logs say otherwise? By 'traffic routing' do you mean CDN, or reverse-proxy or what? A single server with properly-configured client-side HTTP caching should do the trick for serving a static site.