3 ms·

I leave it running continuously for weeks on my Mac, with no issues. It is currently using 700MB across all of its processes (5 by my count). Doesn't seem like

by raydev 4y ago

I leave it running continuously for weeks on my Mac, with no issues. It is currently using 700MB across all of its processes (5 by my count). Doesn't seem like that big of a problem. I understand it used to be a much larger problem. Maybe it's time to try it out again.

SahAssar 4y ago
My problem with the app isn't resource usage, it's that a chat client that's already a webpage shouldn't need me to install a app. It's ridiculous how far slack will go on purpose to not support the platform their app is built on.
- raydev 4y ago
  As a chat client that facilitates communication with my coworkers, I don't want to limit it to a tab in Chrome. Chrome is an app that I close often, I can't recall a time I've wanted to close Slack.
  - hackmiester 4y ago
    That's fair, but don't confuse your habit of quitting your Web browser for typical behavior.
  - SahAssar 4y ago
    I never close my browser unless I have to, but sure that might not be the normal behavior. I still don't get why they can't give an acceptable experience on the platform they built it on without wrapping it in a useless wrapper. Keep the app, just make sure I can use your service on the platform it's built on.
  - trinix912 4y ago
    That's fine but they should make it possible to use it completely in-browser as well. I'm not a fan of having five Chromium instances constantly running on my MacBook.
Mo3 4y ago
Almost a GB for a chat application? I definitely see a problem there..
- raydev 4y ago
  Memory is designed to be used. I guess if I'm memory constrained I can close it, but it's never been the source of any of my day-to-day problems while coding.
  - approxim8ion 4y ago
    Memory is designed to be used, and there are plenty of applications that are vying for it. I'd much rather an app use memory optimally, so that I don't have to close it if I'm memory-constrained.

3 ms·

I leave it running continuously for weeks on my Mac, with no issues. It is currently using 700MB across all of its processes (5 by my count). Doesn't seem like

by raydev 4y ago

SahAssar 4y ago
My problem with the app isn't resource usage, it's that a chat client that's already a webpage shouldn't need me to install a app. It's ridiculous how far slack will go on purpose to not support the platform their app is built on.
- raydev 4y ago
  As a chat client that facilitates communication with my coworkers, I don't want to limit it to a tab in Chrome. Chrome is an app that I close often, I can't recall a time I've wanted to close Slack.
  - hackmiester 4y ago
    That's fair, but don't confuse your habit of quitting your Web browser for typical behavior.
  - SahAssar 4y ago
    I never close my browser unless I have to, but sure that might not be the normal behavior. I still don't get why they can't give an acceptable experience on the platform they built it on without wrapping it in a useless wrapper. Keep the app, just make sure I can use your service on the platform it's built on.
  - trinix912 4y ago
    That's fine but they should make it possible to use it completely in-browser as well. I'm not a fan of having five Chromium instances constantly running on my MacBook.
Mo3 4y ago
Almost a GB for a chat application? I definitely see a problem there..
- raydev 4y ago
  Memory is designed to be used. I guess if I'm memory constrained I can close it, but it's never been the source of any of my day-to-day problems while coding.
  - approxim8ion 4y ago
    Memory is designed to be used, and there are plenty of applications that are vying for it. I'd much rather an app use memory optimally, so that I don't have to close it if I'm memory-constrained.