5 ms·
Of course, I had to test it with this photo: https://imgur.com/a/ypyIhB3 https://imgur.com/a/ypyIhB3 Not too bad! Can definitely tell it's been edited, but fo
by michaelchisari 4y ago
Of course, I had to test it with this photo:
https://imgur.com/a/ypyIhB3 https://imgur.com/a/ypyIhB3
Not too bad! Can definitely tell it's been edited, but for a quick removal it was painless.
- gojomo 4y agoThat image should be the 'Lena' of person-removal image benchmarks.
- nevf1 4y agoThis gave me a good chuckle, thanks!
- gus_massa 4y agoIt's so good that I though you were making a joke and posting the classic edited photo, but after looking at the wave patterns, they look different. Also the bottom of the other side of the channel is better in your version. For context: https://www.history.com/news/josef-stalin-great-purge-photo-retouching https://www.history.com/news/josef-stalin-great-purge-photo-...
- gc0119 4y agoThanks for the thumbsup on painlessness!
- gc0119 4y agoWow, that's a really dark one! Never thought it could reproduce a piece of history, you made my day.