3 ms·
I think eropple's point was that ARC is not a very high-level sort of approach to GC, i.e., not Lisp-style exact GC.
by chalst 15y ago
I think eropple's point was that ARC is not a very high-level sort of approach to GC, i.e., not Lisp-style exact GC.
- eropple 15y agoThat's right (sorry, forgot about this thread). Not saying that ARC is bad, for where it's used--but it doesn't strike me as terribly "high-level". (Neither, though, does C++, and smart pointers don't help there either. ;) )