"Not one word there about Elon Musk's personality." Why would there be? The article is a legal analysis of the likely outcomes of Twitter's suit, a topic of o

"Not one word there about Elon Musk's personality." Why would there be? The article is a legal analysis of the likely outcomes of Twitter's suit, a topic of obvious interest to any WSJ readers thinking about buying/selling Twitter stock, as well as any who are interested in the broader implications of Musk taking control of Twitter, or not. It's not so clear that WSJ readers are interested in Musk's personality, and even if they are, there's no reason to think that a writer qualified to comment on legal issues will also be a qualified psychologist.