3 ms·
I love the idea. But I wish I didn't have to ship the entire runtime to the client, and was instead compiled to efficient DOM operations. Because of the size o
by voat 4y ago
I love the idea. But I wish I didn't have to ship the entire runtime to the client, and was instead compiled to efficient DOM operations.
Because of the size of the runtime, I'd rather use something like Solid.js which is smaller and faster.
- recursivedoubts 4y agoA custom runtime is necessary due to the async transparancy feature of the language: https://hyperscript.org/docs/#async https://hyperscript.org/docs/#async It is dependency free and a bit under 30kb gz'd, which is roughly where jQuery is, and hyperscript is intended as a jQuery replacement. That's 35ms on emerging 4g, and in the browser cache after that. Probably not noticable for most situations.