4 ms·
Sure (I mean that is shady but whatever) but at least it would seem logical to verify the redirect chain ends up on that domain or better yet (since the redirec
by progbits 4y ago
Sure (I mean that is shady but whatever) but at least it would seem logical to verify the redirect chain ends up on that domain or better yet (since the redirects could change later) only allow the domain if ownership has been verified though DNS or similar.
I simply don't see why I should be able to buy ad that shows "google.com".
- ziml77 4y agoThat's fucking insane that it's allowed. But if the ability to override the domain is truly that important, then there needs to be manual vetting of the ad buyer and the target domain. I'm sure you could automate it with signed TXT records, but I think there should still be a human in the chain to at least double-check everything.
- ouid 4y ago>That is shady but whatever This century's motto