5 ms·
I'm sorry but both your sources are dreadful. The first one is an anonymous blogger who is at war with capitalization, and who constantly makes edgy points that
by epups 4y ago
I'm sorry but both your sources are dreadful. The first one is an anonymous blogger who is at war with capitalization, and who constantly makes edgy points that are clearly addressed in the original study. The second is a self-evident exercise in futility.
- thedrbrian 4y agoFunny how you don’t attack the ideas/content of the links , just the posters themselves.
- epups 4y agoI find that commenting on health policy while hiding your identity definitely compromises your credibility. If you further compound that by self-publishing your material and writing like a literal child, I don't think it's unwarranted to include that as criticism. Do you like the content itself? Some random drawing of arrows in cherry-picked graphs?
- collyw 4y agoAre you aware of the censorship going on around anyone who deviates from the official narrative? As the other poster said, you are aren't attacking the argument, just the fact that it is anonymous. What's your username on here? epups. The irony.
- collyw 4y agoThere are 150 more studies to show what bullshit the masks are. https://brownstone.org/articles/more-than-150-comparative-studies-and-articles-on-mask-ineffectiveness-and-harms/ https://brownstone.org/articles/more-than-150-comparative-st...