3 ms·
There already is a syntax for that: a |> bar |> foo
by ChrisRackauckas 4y ago
There already is a syntax for that: a |> bar |> foo
- singularity2001 4y agoneat, thanks! it's still a bit unergonomic to type but a very useful beginning! Reminds me of hurting my fingers in c where you had to type '->' instead of '.' !