3 ms·
I think parent comment was implying the alternative is NoScript
by weberer 4y ago
I think parent comment was implying the alternative is NoScript
- Nursie 4y agoCertainly that's one approach, but perhaps there's a middle ground, where we can have trusted sources of JS. Perhaps not, but I do stand by my initial comment, it's crazy we just download and execute stuff from wherever and somehow have expectations of security!
- silon42 4y agoWe need some kind of a code review system (peer based?) to review JS code that is allowed to be enabled.