3 ms·
Here's the title of the posted video: "Skaters Mob on High Tech Surveillance Car in San Francisco" Meanwhile, its posted on Instagram[0]... and in the video yo
by fny 4y ago
Here's the title of the posted video: "Skaters Mob on High Tech Surveillance Car in San Francisco"
Meanwhile, its posted on Instagram[0]... and in the video you see a bajillion phones out recording the event.
Oh the irony...
[0]: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cf2FPFsPZeD/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Cf2FPFsPZeD/
- rektide 4y agoThis attempt to counter-chastize rings hollow to me. We all have phones we can use to film things. Yes. They do an ok 1080p, many technically can do 4k but look close at the capture & you'll see it's largely mush. To record, people have to pull put their phones & aim that at things: a specific & noticable event. One that typically comes at very significant battery usage costs. Now by compare here's a vehicle with multiple sensor devices that cost multiple thousands of dollars a piece. You can jolly well bet these are predominntly always on devices. There's no indicator for when these devices might send the data back to the mothership or not- a true panoptician design; the threat of recordings being sent up is perpetually implied, it's medium-term buffers likely to get uploaded if anything happens or sampled anyways just because. These high end sensor platforms are actively roaming, are driving about, working together to gain a vast top down composite view of the world, something again a couple random instagram feeds provides only the faintest most distant glimmer of. The power control & hierarchy here is clear as day to me. Fearing uncoordinated masses with low res handheld phones feels ridiculous by compare.