>does not need to be on crypto/blockchain. Not only don't you need blockchains you can phrase it more strongly, it renders the entire thing impossible. A socia

>does not need to be on crypto/blockchain. Not only don't you need blockchains you can phrase it more strongly, it renders the entire thing impossible. A social network needs a messaging protocol, data ownership should be private and state local or else it doesn't even scale. Pushing the entire history of a what is p2p, private communication through a global state machine is entirely antithetical to the use case. Imagine every time you talk to your neighbor you inform the entire country first, there's no point.