> The erratic scheduling and the "cut" shifts were a feature, not a bug, we were told. It kept employees from getting a second job that they might dare prioriti

> The erratic scheduling and the "cut" shifts were a feature, not a bug, we were told. It kept employees from getting a second job that they might dare prioritize over their current job. I always suspected that this was the reason for abusive retail scheduling. Thanks for confirming my suspicion. This should be illegal.