4 ms·
Conceptually great idea, but I think setting the cap of top employee compensation as a multiplier of the lowest paid employee is a better start, as well as requ
by ebiester 4y ago
Conceptually great idea, but I think setting the cap of top employee compensation as a multiplier of the lowest paid employee is a better start, as well as requiring full benefits for any employee rather than a minimum. (You will have to tweak other things, and make sure to crack down on wage theft for overtime, etc, but this will remove the disincentive to hiring full time.)
It isn't so much that we want to discourage investment in food supply and other service sectors but rather to increase the living conditions of those working in them.
It will mean increased labor costs, decreased stock market profits, and a bit of inflation. I argue that for humane labor practices, this is an acceptable compromise for a civilized society.
- Gibbon1 4y agoThinking mode you could adjust the corporate tax rate, tax on officers salaries, dividends, and capital gains to account for the lower tax rate on lower paid employees. Would also help for the government to tax stock buybacks as profit and dividends.
- lotsofpulp 4y ago> Would also help for the government to tax stock buybacks as profit and dividends. Why? The gain from stock buy back is already captured in capital gains taxes. Simply increase the capital gains tax rate of the goal is to increase taxes collection.