4 ms·
(background: I work in tech mergers and acquisitions for a company that does pre-acquisition diligence.) It is worth noting that, most of the time, the things
by iainctduncan 4y ago
(background: I work in tech mergers and acquisitions for a company that does pre-acquisition diligence.)
It is worth noting that, most of the time, the things that are so wonderful about working at the small company are fun for all the same reasons that they aren't sustainable. Most startups are not cash positive - they don't make money, they just lose money more slowly than they get investment (by selling off bits of the company). So very often, the stuff you want to have continue just can't because it was based on imaginary income. The exit plan always involves the company becoming profitable at some point (maybe after multiple rounds of acquisitions) and that usually means that on each round the company has to become more realistic about how they spend their money, including how they manage their devs.
On the other hand, it's true that a small lifestyle company can keep many of those things, but they do that by not having a plan to sell, which tends to mean you get the spirit and independence but not the throwing-around-cash-like-it-was-free fun times.
When you factor in opportunity-cost, the whole office plays lazer tag on friday is really bloody expensive.
- stevage 4y agoHow do Google and Facebook etc manage it then?
- iainctduncan 4y agoNote that I said "most of the time". Google and Facebook are so far off the usual scenarios for startups and acquisitions that it's not even relevant. We do hundreds of acquisition diligences a year and the FAANG playbook is a whole different beast from the vast majority of acquisitions.