> What specifically? Just comparing Nikon mirrorless to Nikon DSLRs, the F-mount (for DSLRs) has, for example, the highly regarded 14-24mm f/2.8. What's the mir

> What specifically? Just comparing Nikon mirrorless to Nikon DSLRs, the F-mount (for DSLRs) has, for example, the highly regarded 14-24mm f/2.8. What's the mirrorless equivalent to that? The Z mount 14-24mm f/2.8 that's even sharper and has fewer optical flaws than the F-mount version. > But here's the big thing with DSLRs over mirrorless: input lag for target tracking. An optical viewfinder ("OVF") is just inherently faster than any electronic viewfinder ("EVF"). For a lot of people that doesn't matter. If you're trying to shoot an animal on the run or a racing car then it probably doe The only thing that matters here for something like the Z9 is the delta between hitting the shutter release and it capturing an image. That is indisputably longer, though short enough it doesn't matter for most folks. For cameras like the Z7ii (which I have personal experience with), yes, tracking kind of sucks because of blackout (in 5 FPS mode) and really sucks in 10 FPS mode (where you're just seeing the last frame). Neither of those are in play for the Z9. I expect we'll see that trickle down to more cameras as time goes on.