3 ms·
I'm curious what your definition of UX is in this case. I have a Q2 and I find that while it's a little quirky and they made some specific strange decisions in
by yladiz 4y ago
I'm curious what your definition of UX is in this case. I have a Q2 and I find that while it's a little quirky and they made some specific strange decisions in development to be a very powerful and pleasant to use camera and I enjoy using it over my previous DSLR because of its low weight, beautiful lens (which in reality is what you're paying 2/3 of the money for anyway) and the photos it can produce, and specifically on the point of the EVF, it's really one of the better ones on the market from my experience. The biggest critique I have for the camera is the abysmal battery life, and the fact that they changed to a proprietary (and very thick) battery compared to the Q.
- jeromenerf 4y agoI cannot say I am surprised by the great quality of the build and the resulting images, it's Leica. They are expensive but they surely deliver. "Not surprised", but still, it's really good. The EVF though was laggy, had weird focus picking/assist in manual mode, weird blueish white balance, the artificial depth of field preview ... I am sure it's featureful and better than the competition but I did not enjoy the experience, which is usually the brand trademark, rangefinder and so on. I found the Fuji X100 hybrid EVF/OVF approach more pleasing. Me not understanding the appeal doesn't mean others can't though. I wish you all the best with this camera.