3 ms·
I know but that's just bizarre. One function has it's own this and another doesn't so if my arrow function gets big and I want to make it a regular function I m
by labrador 4y ago
I know but that's just bizarre. One function has it's own this and another doesn't so if my arrow function gets big and I want to make it a regular function I may have to rewrite it. Ugh.
Edit: I'm thinking of cognitive load too. I like to eliminate load I don't need. Keeping track of this is not something I want to do with my life
https://drpicox.medium.com/reducing-programmers-cognitive-overload-e14df3b73432 https://drpicox.medium.com/reducing-programmers-cognitive-ov...
- chmod775 4y ago> so if my arrow function gets big and I want to make it a regular function I may have to rewrite it. There's absolutely no reason to make an arrow function a regular function just because it goes past a certain number of lines. It really seems like you should become more familiar before forming an opinion. There's valid criticism to be made, but those aren't it.
- labrador 4y agoI sometimes refactor code for purely aesthetic reasons. To each his own. http://www.synergeticapplications.com/ergonomics.htm http://www.synergeticapplications.com/ergonomics.htm By the way, I feel like I'm at a bar and you're negging me