so how is blockchain supposed to mitigate identity remaining the same? i am assuming if i want to block a bad actor on the chain, i note that and later wheneve

so how is blockchain supposed to mitigate identity remaining the same? i am assuming if i want to block a bad actor on the chain, i note that and later whenever someone queries their address, my note is shown so what is it solving? >And because discovery of instances is not perfectly frictionless, people tend to just sign up for the big instances the solution exists, sure it might not be frictionless as of now but its not like it is a fundamental problem? yeah, blockchain is not the solution. >The compromise of decentralization is that if you have an account on mastodon.social, they can censor you admins of mastodon.social can but so can any other instance so how is that a bad thing? how do we equally fight spammers/bad actors and at the same time prevent good people who have been banned to say their words? isnt good/bad inherently a subjective issue that is to be decided by a person? activitypub gives users and admins the power to decide so what is the problem there? i am not questioning you specifically, just asking