>>I don't think anyone would disagree with that. I would, for a large number of reasons, at the basic level no one really agrees what the "world should be" thu

>>I don't think anyone would disagree with that. I would, for a large number of reasons, at the basic level no one really agrees what the "world should be" thus your regulations for a utopia would not match mine. Further government has proven through out history to be very poor at creating the kind of word "we want the live in" Instead government, the law, "rules and regulations" should be about impartial conflict resolution and protection of natural rights not attempting to create some kind of Utopia that it can never achieve and will make everyone life worse in the attempt