Saying my source glosses over something doesn't mean the assertion is wrong, it only means it doesn't go into detail. Here's a tad more complex paper with exam

Saying my source glosses over something doesn't mean the assertion is wrong, it only means it doesn't go into detail. Here's a tad more complex paper with examples https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987984/ The similarities and ethical concerns are why mice are used. However my original comment was because the post implied the research was wrong because they "don't look like mouse". Which I said was overy simplistic and arrogant. As if then a researcher reading that comment would suddenly realize "wait..were not mice, this and all other studies are worthless. I used mice for no reason but couldn't think of a reason not to or how they are different"