His prison conditions seem to extremely bad and your response is to argue he had a fair trial by a jury of his peers. I wonder if you can see that one does not

His prison conditions seem to extremely bad and your response is to argue he had a fair trial by a jury of his peers. I wonder if you can see that one does not relate to the other? He should be punished by being incarcerated, not by other prisoners during incarceration, no? I would dispute that the mere fact that he did not have a jury trial where he lived was unfair and an indication that he did not actually have a jury of his peers. He was arrested in San Francisco and tried in New York City. Those are different worlds on technology and drug issues.