4 ms·
I think that's missing the point of the GP, because our Windows 9x machines with 64 MB of RAM also had plenty of room for cache. Of course, there have been real
by mwcampbell 4y ago
I think that's missing the point of the GP, because our Windows 9x machines with 64 MB of RAM also had plenty of room for cache. Of course, there have been real advances in GUIs since Windows 9x, and the 9x kernel was hardly state of the art even for its time. But I don't know if a minimum of 2 GB of RAM, and probably more like 4 GB for a usable system, is really necessary.
- ChuckNorris89 4y agoYou can't apples to apples compare windows 95 RAM usage logic with the one implemented in Windows 10/11. Of course old OSs used less.
- nix23 4y ago>Of course old OSs used less. "Why" is the question here. New cars don't use more petrol. And new bikes are not heavier then old ones.