3 ms·
That is how most sports are. There's not all that much strategy involved in amateur league tennis or football either, execution rules supreme. I don't think you
by WJW 4y ago
That is how most sports are. There's not all that much strategy involved in amateur league tennis or football either, execution rules supreme. I don't think you can separate out execution from strategy unless you explicitly separate out the time pressure, such as in (non-bullet/blitz) chess. But RTS without the RT part is a very different game.
- spywaregorilla 4y agoYeah, it's not that it's unique or anything. But the S is supposed to be the value prop of the RTS genre. Most people are fine with the focus being on execution for sports and FPS and what not.
- d1sxeyes 4y agoWell compare and contrast with turn-based strategy games like Civilisation - I don't think the S is the value proposition per se. I think the combination of RT + S is what drives people to the genre. There are plenty of excellent turn-based strategy games where time pressure is effectively removed, and only the planning component is important. I'd recommend turn-based strategy for anyone who is not particularly interested in the execution part.
- Blozvez 4y ago[dead]
- Regardozz 4y agoWell, that's for the amateur sports, but I can tell you that if we're talking about professional sports where players are way more skilled, the strategy there plays a huge role. I didn't understand that before I started keeping track of the sports with http://www.televisionet.tv/ http://www.televisionet.tv/ , but at the same time, it's pretty obvious that execution rules supreme anyway, there's no doubt