3 ms·
That would be a good idea, if rust actually would implement memory safety, type safety and concurrency safety. the first goal is stated in the docs, but violate
by rurban 4y ago
That would be a good idea, if rust actually would implement memory safety, type safety and concurrency safety. the first goal is stated in the docs, but violated by its implementation, the other two are not even fulfilled by their specs.
what's missing is concurrency safety for lisp. and enforcing compile-time type safety in the proposed lisp kernel. not just the usual run-time type safeties.
lisp can ignore the unsafe POSIX architecture (esp. blocking IO), so there's a chance.