It's possible to come up with different conclusions than that, IMO, rather pessimistic one. I had already had this notion that unions likely decrease quality o

It's possible to come up with different conclusions than that, IMO, rather pessimistic one. I had already had this notion that unions likely decrease quality of work, but my conclusion has not been "products over workers", my conclusion has been that companies which mistreat their workers so much that they feel the need to unionize deserve to suffer. There could even be a deeper correlation there in younger companies. Worker mistreatment seems to me to be a sign of incompetence. The companies that do so deserve any ill results they get from unionizing and better companies that treat their workers better and make better products deserve to win out over them.