The whole article suffers from poor writing (on an objective scale) from start to finish. What we don't know is where the author started from: On a subjective

The whole article suffers from poor writing (on an objective scale) from start to finish. What we don't know is where the author started from: On a subjective scale, they may be a significantly better writer than when they started. Neither of those things actually good responses to the article, though: Good writing is hard, and the article demonstrates that well.