3 ms·
Your making the argument that nuclear is not a heating option because gas is cheaper. If we’re going for the cheapest option, then why not fuck the planet comp
by mr_toad 4y ago
Your making the argument that nuclear is not a heating option because gas is cheaper.
If we’re going for the cheapest option, then why not fuck the planet completely and all burn coal?
- hef19898 4y agoMy argument is that nuclear is a different of energy compared to gas when used for heating. Sonce gas for heating is the tipic at hand, this distinction is quite important. And nowhere did I mention price. I talked about how converting electricity to heat is highly inefficient and will cost nore to heat the same building than gas. Nuclear only factors into that as much as it factors into a given electrical energy generatuon mix.
- kalleboo 4y agoConverting gas to heat is just as inefficient as converting electricity to heat