> it did the work the DOJ needed it to do. Certainly. And no wonder that the other charges from the Maryland District were dismissed. > he was indicted for it

> it did the work the DOJ needed it to do. Certainly. And no wonder that the other charges from the Maryland District were dismissed. > he was indicted for it, twice, in the SDNY case. You mean, he was charged and found guilty of "Murder-For-Hire"? This I don't follow. I thought overt acts serve the purpose of evidence for the charges/counts rather than being charges itself. In any case, DPR clearly concluded, that paying someone to kill someone else in order to preserve his anonymity/enterprise was OK. He even committed it.