4 ms·
at some point e2e encrypted comms will be grounds for getting swatted don't think this is a bridge too far, covering your face in the presence of public CCTV g
by muyuu 4y ago
at some point e2e encrypted comms will be grounds for getting swatted
don't think this is a bridge too far, covering your face in the presence of public CCTV got you fined/arrested the week before covering your face with feel-good masks was compulsory
don't @ me telling me it's stupid, I know it is, but this govt doesn't believe in free and private communications and it's working hard in progressively eradicating what's already out there, with full support from the main opposition party
- orangepurple 4y agoFortunately, where there is a will, there is a way. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209044791730031X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209044791...
- muyuu 4y agoonly a tiny fraction of the people will bother with the immense overhead of steganography it would much more practicable to resort to alternative channels outside the internet, like mesh networking using direct comms (typically ad-hoc wifi modes and other radio protocols to avoid the liability/detectability of cabling), sneakernet, IP over Avian Carriers - those are all cumbersome and rather slow typically, but still orders of magnitude better than trying to pass stuff over ISPs using steganography
- throwaway4aday 4y agoWith network enabled SoC's costing $1 and associated charge controller, battery and solar cell coming in around $5 I could definitely see a future where people roll out their own clandestine internets in order to route around the centralized and regulated internet. The simplest form of this is a single access point set up as a piratebox allowing people within range to connect and download/upload files. It could be scaled to a large mesh network covering an entire city.