> But it improves outcomes for some students. Correct, but it’s a fraction of 1%, and those students would have already graduated in the top of their classes.

> But it improves outcomes for some students. Correct, but it’s a fraction of 1%, and those students would have already graduated in the top of their classes. Ducey cites a program that works better for the top fraction of students as a solution for the larger population. In other charter schools with true open enrollment, the outcomes are worse than public schools. Overall, this will damage education in Arizona, and it’s all done for politics. That makes Ducey the worst of politicians. If he could demonstrate general improvements over public schools, I’d happily support the change.