3 ms·
Well that's the websites problem, no body told them to include 50 trackers. And there are many filters to kill cookies banners. Also AFAIK now there is an enfor
by jacooper 4y ago
Well that's the websites problem, no body told them to include 50 trackers. And there are many filters to kill cookies banners.
Also AFAIK now there is an enforced Reject All button.
- shadowgovt 4y agoIt's also the user's problem because there aren't websites to go to that aren't showing those banners. Well, except the big, commonly-used ones where you've already consented (or not). Facebook, for instance. It's like this law was hand-tuned to consolidate users into only visiting a few commonly-accessed sites to save themselves the UX annoyance at the cost of the broader Internet's discoverability.
- jacooper 4y agoI don't agree, many websites don't have it. Its a choice that these we sites that they want to still track everyone, and they are paying for it in bad UX.
- shadowgovt 4y agoIt's the safest choice given the incentives.