Finding people who are good at reviewing your code is very difficult. I think this is generally true even without the emphasis on my particular code. Most fol

Finding people who are good at reviewing your code is very difficult. I think this is generally true even without the emphasis on my particular code. Most folks suck even more at reviewing than they do at coding. And of course it's always hard to find really good developers. I think there might be attractive qualities for a high quality developer to take on such a project though.. For instance: Short off-time hours.. like someone in Seattle could review pretty interesting code after their stupid day of meetings that they got sucked into by being too good at their job. Hell, they might be able to do it _in_ the meetings. Pay... I'd happily pay well over good dev rates for a good reviewer (or set of reviewers). People telling me how I'm dumb and how to improve is great. Joy of working outside of Java / C# / C++ / VB / ASP.NET corporate code. Freedom to rip stuff apart without fearing for one's job or worrying about office politics. Some of us have a lot of pent up rage :)