That's a fair but, but is a drastically different story than what the headline implies. "Internal messages indicate that Binance might have turned a blind eye

That's a fair but, but is a drastically different story than what the headline implies. "Internal messages indicate that Binance might have turned a blind eye to Iranians using VPNs (and later banned them)" is a much weaker claim than "Binance continued serving Iranians despite sanctions" As I mentioned in a different comment, the headline might be technically true, and there's definitely a story, but the headline paints a drastically different picture than the article. Almost every line of "we found someone in Iran who had gotten in" is followed by "they got banned later"