3 ms·

Ghidra is fantastic, it has some issues and is obviously missing some still-classified components but even still it's competitive with IDA and Binary Ninja.

• derefr 4y ago
  Are the obvious omissions obvious enough to be able to name any of them? E.g. are there any languages that would be expected to have decompilation support, but don't? Or any static-analysis passes that are clearly relying on underpowered prebuilt datasets only supplied to make the pass function in a nominal sense, where there's clearly some much larger prebuilt dataset used in the classified version?
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • nibbleshifter 4y ago
    A lot of the "type libraries" are missing (you can make your own). Some specific processors are noticeably unsupported (you can fix this yourself by writing definitions). The extensions for analysis of mobile applications and debugging mobile targets are missing. Parts of the debugger are still missing (eg: syncing debugger with disassembly/decompiler). Some features are extremely poorly documented (eg: importing source code). A lot of bits that otherwise seem missing are likely proprietary scripts and extensions/tools that probably can't be released due to either being classified or owned by a defense contractor.
• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]