4 ms·
Interesting paper. My first thought at a glance is that it would really benefit from a bit more detailed kinematic modelling, for example considering the approx
by azalemeth 4y ago
Interesting paper. My first thought at a glance is that it would really benefit from a bit more detailed kinematic modelling, for example considering the approximately quadratic-in-velocity drag force (very important when talking about differing spear designs!) and computing approximate coefficients of drag. The main issue is that the force that muscles can generate is a function of velocity (higher contraction velocity, lower force) and hence the total specific impulse imparted to a spear is limited, but the power-time curve a human arm might be able to generate is complex and bounded within some physiological limitations. I'm sure you could go to town with this data (well, if you're an aerodynamicist, at least). Spears and the ilk are very nice shapes mathematically to play with.
- simonh 4y agoIt seems that at the distances they were testing for there was no consequential loss of velocity. This is because the spears picked up some speed from gravitational acceleration, due to being released at a greater height than the target. Since the spears are heavier and have much less drag compared to projectiles like arrows that are fletched, it seems like drag losses and potential energy transfers more or less cancel out. In fact for some throws impact velocity was actually greater than release velocity.