> It explicitly declines specifying that /bin/sh exists. Huh. TIL. I've worked with POSIX for a couple of decades now, and I was sure that it required `/bin/sh

> It explicitly declines specifying that /bin/sh exists. Huh. TIL. I've worked with POSIX for a couple of decades now, and I was sure that it required `/bin/sh` to be a valid path to the shell. Thanks!